The performance characteristics are attractive with incredibly fast cold starts and minimal memory overhead. But the practical limitation is language support. You cannot run arbitrary Python scripts in WASM today without compiling the Python interpreter itself to WASM along with all its C extensions. For sandboxing arbitrary code in arbitrary languages, WASM is not yet viable. For sandboxing code you control the toolchain for, it is excellent. I am, however, quite curious if there is a future for WASM in general-purpose sandboxing. Browsers have spent decades solving a similar problem of executing untrusted code safely, and porting those architectural learnings to backend infrastructure feels like a natural evolution.
“Any employee can message me with feedback, ideas, questions, or concerns,” Rascoff wrote in a recent LinkedIn post. “No hierarchy. No filters. Just real input.”
。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Stack allocation of variable-sized slices
63-летняя Деми Мур вышла в свет с неожиданной стрижкой17:54
The reason is always the same: the content and the key that decrypts it are both present on the client’s machine. The user’s hardware decrypts the content to display it. The user’s hardware is, definitionally, something the user controls. Any sufficiently motivated person with the right tools can intercept the decrypted output.